Featured Services:
Asbestos Removal,
CNC Machining & Milling,
Commercial Electricians,
Crane Hire,
Electronic Design & Engineering,
Fire Safety & Protection ,
Forklift Training & Licences,
HVAC Cleaning,
Industrial Design,
Office Fitouts,
Plumbing,
Road Freight,
Safety Consultants,
Sheetmetal Fabrication,
Structural Engineering,
Warehousing & Distribution,
Welding Services
News Article
Aussies among 'top contributors to Earth's decline': WWF
16/05/2012 - Australians are among the top contributors to the Earth's environmental decline, due mostly to our carbon emissions, according to the 2012 Living Planet Report released by conservation group WWF. Gabrielle Dunlevy
Find related suppliers
The report estimates humans are using 50 per cent more resources than the planet can provide.
Australians have the seventh largest environmental impact.
If everyone lived like the average Australian, it would take 3.76 planets to support the world's population, the report says.
Australia comes seventh behind Qatar, Kuwait, UAE, Denmark, the United States and Belgium - one spot worse than in the last report in 2010.
WWF Australia ecologist Dr Martin Taylor says it's a top 10 ranking the nation should be ashamed of.
"If the rest of the world lived the way we did, we'd need four planets," he told reporters.
"We've only got one I'm afraid so something has to give at some point."
Carbon emissions are the top contributor to Australia's footprint, which the report measures in "global hectares" - a measure of the productive land and water area required to support our consumption and pollution levels.
Australians require 6.68 global hectares per person, Dr Taylor says, which is very high even for a developed nation.
He has a simple message for the federal government on this: stay the course on pricing carbon.
"All it's doing is trying to level the playing field so renewables can get a head start," Dr Taylor said.
"It's still not level, we've still got enormous fossil fuel subsidies. Let's get rid of the subsidies because that's what's kept the playing field so imbalanced for so long."
Dr Taylor says Australians don't have to sacrifice quality of life in order to perform better - we just have to find new solutions to the energy problem.
"There are countries on this planet that have half the footprint that Australia does but have the same quality of life," he says.
"It's almost inexcusable that we're not taking advantage of our talents of our energy and putting them to innovate the way we use resources in Australia."
Source:
AAP
Browse the IndustrySearch directory: Waste & Environmental Management
Pat
| 16/05/2012 09:53
1
This is just sooooo much hogwash. These figures are manipulated and deliberately aimed at a Federal government that is gullible enough to believe them and undertake drastic measures to appease these GREEN fruitloops. It defies logic that we pollute so much. Why dont these people take on the Chinese, Indian or United States governments. And stay out of our gullible gutless politicians faces.
David Chin
| 16/05/2012 10:43
2
Pat. Wake up. It is not these groups feeding a gullible Government...It is a lying Government supporting these types of groups because the groups provide this kind of rubbish to support the Government in their devious plan to have us as a third world country and completely under their control. They only want the money and greed will prevail...unless we stop them at the next election.
David
| 16/05/2012 11:25
3
There is No truth in this story on global warming caused by humans creating a carbon problem.
It is a fallacious lie put together by scheming Godless people that would make it increasingly difficult for humans in their day to day living and the general economics of business including farming.
There is a new machine taking engine exhaust fumes from the tractor and taking it by way of pipes to a scarifier type point and injecting it into the soil, which then produces a improved crop withiot any super phosphate etc. Just this one fact shows that the present rate of carbon is of no consequence to the world.Ask Ian Plimer, a non connected politically scientist unlike others who are receiving money/financial help to say what politicians/governments want to hear.
David.J.
Vic Garland
| 16/05/2012 12:08
4
o Australia produces (historically) approximately 1.1% of global carbon emitted.
o Should Australia to hypothetically stop carbon production totally, to zero; We can only ever change the global carbon production by 1.1%. Now just think about that for a minute; On a global scale, it is a barely significant contribution.
o Now add to that, the intention to cut Australia’s emissions by 5% by 2020. that amounts to reducing the carbon contribution of the globe by 1/20th of 1.1%. Incredibly miniscule overall.
o Add to that; Globally, in general, those who produce most Co2, do the least, and none appear really seriously interested in the argument at all.
The per capita argument is a specious argument, it doesn’t matter whether the population is 100 or 100M, we produce what we produce at this point in time. That is all we can change, the total.... Should we need to.
The carbon tax argument, is causing extraordinary financial pain, so much so that most of the tax raised is being sucked up by compensation for hardship due to the tax. What a silly manufactured situation. And of course leaving little really for anything else such as alternative energy, which is what it should or could be used for if the arguments of climate change are real and serious, having a natural flow on that will again remove the need for more handouts
Ben
| 16/05/2012 12:10
5
What would the impact from 21 million ppl do, when there is over 6 billion ppl and still growing... China and India and other third world countries are the problem causing countries, that is they aren’t anyway because there is no such thing as Climate Change or Global Warming...instead of wasting tons of time researching this stupid crap, why don’t these ppl put their efforts into humanitarian aid for those malnourished and poverty struck? At least it would give them something worth worrying about, and they would be doing some good for a change instead of making our so called “emissions” rise with all this hot air they’re making!!!:)
Jeff Hort
| 16/05/2012 12:21
6
I have never heard such nonsence in my life. You can't compare us to contries that have masses of people that have no no power in the caculation. China is installing more coal fire power weekly than our total usage. Our consumption may be higher but is based on the fact that we all have power on tap.No so for those that we are compared with. Get a life I say to this nonsence.
Bruce
| 16/05/2012 12:56
7
you welcome thoughtful comments. Too bad you didn't get any with this article. Just the usual emotive drivel.
Ces
| 16/05/2012 13:33
8
Bruce just go back to 1.1% of the total for Australia and 5% of that !!!
don't sidetrack the argument into real or unreal global warming. Dr Taylor is pays his mortage by being a believer
Ben
| 16/05/2012 14:31
9
What would the impact from 21 million ppl do, when there is over 6 billion ppl and still growing... China and India and other third world countries are the problem causing countries, that is they aren’t anyway because there is no such thing as Climate Change or Global Warming...instead of wasting tons of time researching this stupid crap, why don’t these ppl put their efforts into humanitarian aid for those malnourished and poverty struck? At least it would give them something worth worrying about, and they would be doing some good for a change instead of making our so called “emissions” rise with all this hot air they’re making!!!:)
Goldie
| 16/05/2012 17:08
10
All we hear from Gillard and Milne is about the new economy and how it wil transform Australia with new green jobs and save us from being branded as global environmental vandals by the WWF.(Thought that was a wrestling outfit)
OK I have a few questions;
What is the new economy going to be and and what point in the downward spiral of the current economy will we see it as things are not the best at the moment; and
What exactly are the new economy jobs in an age when we cannot complete with manufacturing costs of developing countries; our dollar is too high and with technology being what it is fewer and fewer people are required to run anything these days.
Please tell me.
Related Feature Articles
-
Researchers develop optic fibre salinity sensor
Edith Cowan University (ECU) researchers have developed a new water quality sensor...
-
Multi-million investment in hydrogen storage
University of Queensland research has led to a $9.25 million investment in hydrogen...
-
$4 million boost to solar cell research
A project to push the efficiency of nanoplasmonic solar cell technology has received a...
-
Business leadership: an exercise in honesty?
Effective leadership is an exercise in honesty, one of the world's most respected...
Related News
-
Workers at a Newcastle port will strike for eight hours on Friday with...
-
Water will be released from more flooded Queensland mines into rivers...
-
Australia's bosses are being encouraged to employ older women in their...
-
Authorities are investigating rice mills in southern China following tests...
-
NSW needs a container deposit scheme because it will reduce litter and won't...
Related items
-
Selective Catalytic Reduction SystemsSend Request
-
Carbon Emissions & Re-Sheeting Rural RoadsSend Request
-
Diesel & Petrol Fuel Enhancer - FTC DecarbonizerSend Request
-
National Pollutant Inventory (NPI) Reporting | AdvitechSend Request
-
Diploma of Environmental ManagementSend Request
-
Virtual Welding Training Simulator | FroniusSend Request


