Feature Article
      Bookmark and Share
 

Innovation report card gives Australia thumbs up

 
Australian innovation on the up.
 
Australian innovation on the up.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 
Have your say...
 
 

 1
Leslie D. Dunn | 2/08/2011 4:27:24 PM
Of this "government’s estimated investment of $9.4 billion in innovation, science and research for 2011-12". is the amount actually $B1.41 with the remaining $B7.99 going to the Bureaucrats to audit the system? This does not go very far towards Innovation but another financial juggling act that helps keep the bureacrats in a job but falsely makes the politicians "Look Good".
 2
Ross Williams | 3/08/2011 9:37:46 AM
This is just the Government beating its olwn chest while it pays massive salaries and perks to a huge department of incompetent bureaucrats with absolutely no business acumen whatsoever. The Grant system is one of the worst in the world, with pitiful, virtually useless funding that is almost entirely consumed by government paperwork and management requirements that have nothing to do with advancing innovative technology. Advice to any Australian company looking for help from Department of Innovation to advance worthwhile technology - don't even think about it. You will be much better off funding privately or growing organically. Dept of Innovation can put your business back years - time that you could use productively to get to market and exploit the market. Ross Williams
 3
mike turner | 8/08/2011 11:30:30 AM
From my talking with SMEs nationally, the reasons why innovators have dropped using publicly funded research agancies is because of (a) the IP grab and (b)the charge out rate being considerably higher than industry rates - even though the agencies are receiving public monies to underwrite their operations.
 4
Name withheld | 9/08/2011 11:39:37 AM
Organisations innovate no matter what. SMEs seldom refer to solving problems or developing better products as innovation. Government provides assistance with formalised frameworks and subsidies, which organisations (SMEs) are free to partake or not. The coin has a flipside; there are organisations that have substantially benefited from these programs. Many (minority) of SMEs expect a handout and aren’t willing to consider that they may benefit from a better way to fish. I, like many other “Gov.” program affiliates have a solid industrial background, in manufacturing, science, Innovation and export. In industry, I had utilised the various state and federal programs in highly regulated settings, and still achieved yearly growths exceeding 20%. Regulation, while occasionally onerous is a ready-made risk management platform, whether it is WH&S, corporate governance or other. All play a role in reducing operational risk. If so adopted, practices, procedures, policies, training and business strategies can lever off the rigours these provide, rather than treating them as obstacles. So, this is another one of those half-empty half-full glass situations – You decide.
 5
Peter Dietzel | 9/08/2011 11:53:14 PM
This is directed at Ross Williams. My question to you is "What do you know of the Department?" It is obvious you know little of the broader workings, and have no real clue on salaries. I work for the DIISR in a group known as the National Measurement Institute, which formed 5 or so years ago with the merger of the former Australian Government Analytical Laboratories and a group from the CSIRO. We perform significant analyses in the areas of food safety and quality (eg pesticide and heavy metal contamination residues,microbiological and allergen testing;environmental monitoring;physical metrology primary calibrations; and,as of 01July2010, legal metrology. Up to then,each of the jurisdictions had their own field inspectors checking all the balances,fuel pumps etc we take for granted are correct. As of 01July2010, the various jurisdictions came under the National umbrella of Trade Measurements. I hope this has enlightened you a bit. Regards,Peter Dietzel,Analytical Chemist,NMI,DIISR. (oh,and btw, I am a veteran of nearly 28 years with AGAL/NMI, and I am not in the upper ecelon of salaries. In fact, if I had decided to go into private industry after graduating I would probably be in management by now, and a salary at least 50% greater than what I am currently on!)