News Article

SA: Push for wind and solar to blame for high power bills

22/03/2012 - South Australia's power prices are among the highest in the world and Premier Jay Weatherill says providing relief for consumers is a challenge. Tim Dornin, Liza Kappelle

The Liberal opposition has blamed the push for more wind and solar power in SA for the rise in electricity costs.

But Weatherill says it's a legacy of the privatisation of power assets and how the state generates power.

"We have a particular pattern of electricity generation and production here which leads to very high electricity costs,"  Weatherill told reporters on Wednesday.

"That doesn't mean we don't have to look carefully at how we can relieve the burden on households.

"I do want to do more to help people faced with the pressure of high utilities and that's the challenge for us in trying to find ways to do that."

His comments followed a report from the Energy Users Association of Australia, whose members include BHP Billiton, Rio Tinto, BlueScope Steel, Westfield, Coles, Woolworths and Harvey Norman, which showed SA prices were the third highest in the world after Denmark and Germany.

The report found that average household electricity prices had risen by more than 40 per cent since 2007 and would rise by a further 30 per cent by 2013/14.

Australians currently pay about 25 cents per kWh, compared with around 12 cents per kWh in the US, based on 2011 exchange rates.

Opposition Leader Isobel Redmond said that was the result of South Australia's push for more solar and wind power.

"We know that Denmark has more wind power than any other electricity market and Germany has the highest level of solar photovoltaics. The South Australian Labor government has pushed both of these technologies here," Redmond said.

The opposition said the introduction of the federal government's carbon tax in July would also push up power prices.

But a spokesman for South Australia's Minister for Mineral Resources and Energy, Tom Koutsantonis, said renewable energy certificates allowed SA to recover the additional cost of operating wind farms.

Rising power prices were being driven by the need to replace old assets and new investment in network and generation, he said.

SA also has a high percentage of relatively expensive gas-fired electricity generation.

The Energy Supply Association of Australia said electricity price increases were being driven by the upgrading of ageing networks and infrastructure, continued increases in peak demand, a shift to lower-emission technologies and increases in the cost of fuels.


Source: AAP NewsWire
Browse the IndustrySearch directory: Electrical & Power Equipment
Have your say...
Goldie | 22/03/2012 11:33 1
No one knows least of all the public what is actually driving up the price of electricity as all we hear is claim and counter claim from politicians. Somebody surely must have the facts and it is about time that those facts were published for all to see. The excuse of an ageing network has been thrown around for quite a few years now but again no one will make the power companies spell out in detail where all the extra money has gone or when work on the "ageing" network will be complete. It is an open ended siphon with no end in sight and quite frankly nil transparency. Also what is the true cost of wind and solar, again there is claim and counter claim for its contribution to prices. Power companies should be ordered to reveal the positives of solar power being fed back into the grid as it costs them nothing to generate it or maintain the installations from which the power comes. Surely they don't have to burn as much coal/gas because of wind and solar which has to be a cost saving yet we hear nothing of this just a one sided story which would have us believe is all give and no take. Can't help feeling that no one wants the public to know the real story so the gouging can continue.
Ken Goldsmith | 23/03/2012 09:05 2
According to Vic. reports, 60% of recent price increases there are the result of privatisation, customer "churn", and the costs arising from catching and retaining customers in a competitive market. All this is money that IS NOT available for infrastructure upgrades, but goes to advertising, and M$ bonuses for "energy retailer" CEOs.
We welcome thoughtful comments from readers
Comment Guidelines

The approval of your comment is at the discretion of this article's publisher. Write your comment with the following in mind to ensure the highest likelihood of it being approved:
- No promotional undertones
- No use of profanity
- Good spelling, grammar and layout
- Check punctuation, language and missing words
- No use of aggression
- No unsubstantiated claims

We reserve the right to remove comments at our discretion.
Your name is used alongside Comments.
Name:
Email:
Your Comment:
Confim Text: captcha img
Reload characters
Type the characters you see in this box. This helps us prevent automated programs from sending spam.
Related News News icon