Sydney's housing market in the midst of a crisis: report
05/04/2012 - Seventy per cent of under 35s in Sydney will be excluded from the housing market, a UK housing expert says.
Find related suppliers
The figure makes up part of a new report, Homes for All, which found that Sydney's housing market is in crisis, with only half of the supply needed to meet demand.
Co-author Dr Tim Williams says governments need to reconsider tax incentives and policies that encourage investors to push house prices higher.
"Seventy per cent of 35-year-olds and younger cannot afford to buy any kind of home at this point in time, on average," Dr Williams told reporters.
"At the same time we find 22 per cent of Australians own 55 per cent of residential development."
The Homes for All report is an action plan released by the McKell Institute, a new independent body that aims to develop policy ideas and encourage public debate.
It recommends that negative gearing and untaxed capital gains be reconsidered by the government in an effort to drive down house pricing for first-time buyers.
"We've been giving more and more money effectively to people who are in homes," he said.
"We're squeezing younger people out but at the same time we seem to be enabling people to buy two, three and four."
Williams said Australians were building 14,000 to 15,000 homes a year when the figure should be more like 40,000.
"We're way off, tens of thousands behind. No wonder there's a pressure on prices" he said.
He said that about 30 years ago it took three times the median salary to buy a house in Sydney, whereas it now took nine times.
This is a higher ratio than London or New York, the report said.
"We're constraining supply, and shovelling up demand to people who already have money, and making it more difficult for their children to access home ownership," he said.
"No wonder people are staying home at 28, they can't afford to rent, let alone buy."
Dr Williams blamed a lack of supply in Sydney mainly on poor planning processes by the government, making it difficult to get planning approval for new developments.
He said compared to other cities such as Melbourne and Perth, Sydney was producing less than half the number of homes per 10,000 people.
"Sydney produces 43 homes per 10,000 people, while Melbourne produces 103," he said.
The report also cited the "knock on consequences".
"Rents in Sydney are rising four times faster than inflation," Dr Williams said in the report.
"The squeezed middle which used to be able to afford to buy now has to rent, pushing lower income renters to find the fewer remaining cheaper lettings and again further out of Sydney to places with the fewest jobs."
This adds to pressure on public housing waiting lists, with not enough money to house those is need - "let alone build enough new stock".
Dr Williams is advocating good public policy to fix the problem.
Source: AAP NewsWire
Browse the IndustrySearch directory: Infrastructure, Planning & Development
Peter | 5/04/2012 12:46 1
More than 30% of a new house price is governments fees and taxes. The governments makes more out a new house than the developer / builder / owner who take all the risk. The governmenmts are prospering here like noone else in the housing industry and this is relegating the australian dream of home ownership for all into the abiss. At any opportunity the governments are taxing, levying, taking and suppressing anyone that wants to have a go and try to get ahead. Without some form of capitalism the economy ends up in the situation now where basic needs are not being provided for. Anyone who knows anything about history would have seen this coming. You might ask 'Surely the governments can't be this stupid?'.
Richard Altavilla | 5/04/2012 14:09 2
The solution to housing affordablility can be found. For the majority of people to purchase a home for even $100,000 is beyond them.So the likelihood of owning a home and particularly in Sydney is fanciful. Things that can be done to make it possible for people even with the lowest of income to own a home: 1.Government to be joint owner of new residence.So if a property is worth around one million dollars, the expense is split.Now some people may be able to go say 50/50 others may only have a 5 percent share or even less. This makes it immediately possible to get into the home market. If for whatever reasons one needs to sell out. The sale price is divided accordingly.Of course in time if the individual is able to buy out the Government share then the property can be fully theirs. 2.Interest free loans.For this worthy cause this should be done.It's a way the Government can show how serious they are towards housing affordablity. 3.Using sustainable measures to maximise energy efficiency and water consumption. Reducing power and water bills will assist in the long term goal of full ownership. The Government doesn't hesitate to assist other nations who may be in need with countless millions. How much more so its own people to provide basic shelter.
Related Feature Articles
Related products & services
AFCs, BSLs & CrushersSend Request
Suhner Direct - Finishing Solutions Direct To You!Send Request
Frequency Calibrator with TotalizerSend Request
Winter Liner | N-Ferno® 6950 / 6952 | 3-Layer SeriesSend Request
Pneumatic Torque Wrenches | RADSend Request
Electrical Testing & TaggingSend Request