Home Trusted by 600,000+ buyers

CSG vs renewable energy: what the research says

27 June, 2013

A shift from coal-fired to gas-fired power generation will not significantly lower carbon dioxide emissions, new research by the Global Change Institute at The University of Queensland has found.

Energy economics researcher Professor John Foster said the modelling indicated that a transition to gas-fired generation reduced emissions only marginally, and that wholesale prices would be higher than with a renewable energy option.

"The findings contradict a widely-held view that renewable energy is too expensive compared to fossil fuels, and too unreliable to be a major component of Australia's future energy generation by 2035," he said.

"There is no justification for the claim that a high proportion of energy sourced from renewables will drive up wholesale costs, in comparison to a power system heavily dependent on coal seam gas," Professor Foster said.

This finding comes as the Australian government deepens its commitment to developing coal seam gas resources in order to supply lucrative export markets and transition domestic power generation.

Professor Foster said a shift away from coal to lower-emissions gas was required in order to create greater resilience in Australia's power market, but he warned that coal seam gas was not a silver bullet.

"A mix of large-scale renewable energy generation, including solar and wind, together with consumer action to use power more efficiently, will deliver the most resilient Australian power market by 2035," he said.

"While our findings might indicate that pursuing a gas-centric scenario will lead to increased prices and reduced carbon emissions, they may not be sufficient to change the dominant industry view which is intent on replacing coal with gas," Professor Foster said.

The UQ researchers used a commercially-available modelling package, PLEXOS, to model what a transition to gas-fired generation would deliver and compared that to a transition to power from renewable technologies such as solar and wind.

Have your say...

We welcome thoughtful comments from readers
Reload characters
Type the characters you see in this box. This helps us prevent automated programs from sending spam.
Jon Wexler | Tuesday, July 2, 2013, 12:27 PM
No figures given to support Foster's assertion. No reference given to find full text of article. What is the point of your posting without any backup?
IndustrySearch Wes | Tuesday, July 2, 2013, 12:54 PM
Thanks for your feedback, Jon Wexler. For additional reading, the working paper referred to in the article can be accessed through the following link – http://www.uq.edu.au/eemg/docs/workingpapers/2012-13.pdf
Peter Cohen | Thursday, July 4, 2013, 10:41 AM
Using gas allows dual combustion which means a huge increase in efficiency. Also many gas supplies contain large amounts of methane where because of the hydrogen content significant proportion of the exhaust will be water. Can economists abrogate the laws of physics?
Jeremy Nathan | Monday, July 15, 2013, 4:16 PM
Just letting you know this discussion is also taking place on Linkedin. Please add your comments to this important topic: http://www.linkedin.com/groups/CSG-vs-renewable-energy-what-5067009.S.254988119?qid=2f24a208-b436-4d88-b1fc-8fc6771ea789&trk=group_most_popular-0-b-cmr&goback=.gmp_5067009