Australia's #1 industrial directory for equipment & suppliers

Election policy action 'vital' to address looming gas crisis

02 August, 2013

A new Australian Industry Group report highlights the need for political parties to set out election policies to address the alarming rise in gas prices and the worsening squeeze on eastern Australian gas supply.

"Urgent policy action is needed to ensure supply and lower prices for consumers and industry and to avoid job losses," according to Ai Group chief executive Innes Willox.

"The Ai Group report released today provides further evidence of the extent of the problem and a realistic package of solutions – including a national interest test for new LNG export facilities.
 
"The report 'Energy shock – the gas crunch is here' – builds on a survey of gas-using companies across Eastern Australia in April and May. Businesses are finding it extremely difficult to secure gas contracts. Of those businesses currently looking for gas contracts, nearly 10 per cent could not get an offer at all. Another third could not get a serious offer.  26 per cent could get an offer from only one supplier. Only a third of respondents (32 per cent) received multiple contract offers.

"In relation to pricing - of those businesses being offered contracts, businesses seeking relatively short-term contracts to commence in 2013 were seeing offers of an average of $5.12 a gigajoule – a sizable uplift from historic prices of $3-4. 

"For businesses seeking later or longer contracts, the average offer was $8.72 a gigajoule – which is more than double the historic price.  These rises are coming faster than many thought. By comparison, in its first year the carbon tax added around $1.20 per gigajoule to the cost of using gas.  In other words the gas crunch will hit gas users four times harder than the carbon tax did, and this adjustment is coming without compensation, assistance or responsive policy.

"Gas is a valuable export, but it also plays an enormous role in the domestic economy.  Gas fires the boilers in breweries and the furnaces in foundries.  It is a critical direct input into production in the plastics and fertiliser industries and others. 

"A 2012 report prepared for Ai Group and the Plastics and Chemicals Industries Association found that each petajoule of gas used in domestic industry enables $255 million in industrial output – and that we risk immense harm to employment and economic activity if adequate, affordable gas supply is not available.  We shouldn't have to wait till the brewery has no gas for its boilers and the pub has no local beer before serious attention and government action is given to this issue.

"Addressing this gas crunch requires some substantial policy changes. Increasing gas production is essential. However this is not easy – and, on its own won't be enough. Market reforms are needed too and they need to be accelerated. Ai Group is also seeking a national interest test (see Appendix) for new or significantly expanded Liquefied Natural Gas export capacity. 

"Existing LNG projects have triggered much of the current supply squeeze and price rise. Closely following the United States and Canadian models, the national interest test would provide an opportunity to assess the national economic consequences of future major gas export projects.  The public and other gas users would have the chance to understand and respond to proposals before they are locked in.

"We recognise the importance of keeping regulatory burdens low and minimising the time it takes to develop new projects and we propose that a streamlined approach to the national test be developed that works in parallel with other regulatory approval processes. While a national approach to such a test is strongly preferable – with an independent board reporting to the Federal Treasurer – equivalent approval processes could be developed by the States until a national approach can be achieved.

"We do not propose a gas reservation policy and want to maintain Australia's reputation for investment. Gas production and export can flourish under a national interest test, as they do in the United States and Canada. A more considered approach to export approvals is not a silver bullet, but will increase the effectiveness of other necessary actions. 

"In sum, our reform package involves: ensuring domestic gas supply and gas exports can both flourish, by instituting a national interest test for new LNG export capacity; increasing gas production, particularly from unconventional gas resources, by ensuring that regulatory arrangements are in place at all levels of government which command community confidence and make timely, workable and consistent decisions; and enhancing the transparency and competitiveness of the gas market, by accelerating the current market reform agenda and urgently developing more options.

"The reality is, even with these policies in place, gas users face serious pressures and prices will likely never return to the lows that have underpinned many businesses' international competitiveness over the last few decades.

"A near term supply squeeze may be unavoidable but we can, and should, be doing more to ease the longer term risks of restricted gas supply and even higher prices. In this election year we urge all political parties to contribute to the debate and consult with industry on policies to reform Australia's gas market," Willox said.

View comments (5)

Have your say...

We welcome thoughtful comments from readers
Reload characters
Type the characters you see in this box. This helps us prevent automated programs from sending spam.
Kevin Simpson | Monday, August 5, 2013, 12:53 PM
Plan B, put a ceiling on domestic gas prices and do a bit of geo-blocking of our own. Could be that competitive edge our industries are looking for. Plan C, leave it in the ground and bring on the renewables.
Goldie | Monday, August 5, 2013, 6:21 PM
Quite simple really, implement a gas reservation policy despite what the vested interest say to the contrary What's the point of having the resources if the only beneficiaries are the miners, their handful of workers and an overseas country. Given we are one of the most expensive countries in the world in which to live and work and no one, and I mean no one is interested in addressing this affordability issue then we have to try and level things up somehow and a relatively cheap supply of gas would be a fair place to start.
Lionel Fisher | Tuesday, August 6, 2013, 10:37 AM
Do what they do in Canada. Let the gas industry sell the excess AFTER they have supplied the local market at a fair price. Can you see that happening here? I doubt it. Why do our politicians hate this country so much?
dave d | Tuesday, August 6, 2013, 4:56 PM
Lionel,it's simple -they don't have to "apply" for the job (aka Rudds son) and they are not accountable to anyone for performance (or they'd all be out of work -note swan & wong -budget surplus my Butt!!) and they don't have to have the skill sets to perform the task at hand (note the Rudd re-shuffle) -portfolios are handed out by drawing straws !! The only time they get "turfed" is when the government changes (and pick up nice little pensions) -when they get discovered rorting the system (and it's a pity we don't investigate this issue further as the majority would get turfed)or there's a scandal that the Government doesn't want to get their hands dirty with even though the majority have a Ghost in their closet. Why do they hate this country - it's more a question of why don't they care about this country - why should they ?
Lionel Fisher | Tuesday, August 6, 2013, 5:12 PM
I think you have nailed it dave d.