Australia's #1 industrial directory for equipment & suppliers

Redefining SCADA architecture to support substation flexibility

SCADA (Supervisory Control and Data Acquisition) systems have been in use for many years at electric utilities.

Overview

The basic architecture of the SCADA system has remained constant since the first systems were installed over 30 years ago, which were based on the most current information technology available. But as centralised information technology has advanced toward the use of decentralised PCs with servers, the utility’s SCADA architecture has not kept pace.

The challenge with the traditional SCADA architecture is the higher costs associated with new substations and limited flexibility when functional requirements, equipment additions and physical layout changes are required. As with most changes in the electric utility world, a valid business and operational case must be made to justify changes to designs and investments.

This paper discusses why utilities should move from a traditional SCADA architecture to a distributed architecture and how this change affects the physical design of the substation to be simpler, more flexible, and less costly.

The use of local HMI, which is the cornerstone of this new architecture, delivers vast benefits that can help utilities operate better today and puts them on the right path toward a smarter grid into the future.

Current Utility Architecture

Today, the most common type of IT architecture is based on a central server located at the utility’s control center that acts as the central core of the SCADA solution.

Access to the real-time information, status and alarms of the utility’s substations is visible to control center operators through local workstations (Desktop PCs).

However, non-real-time information, which is useful for analysing sequence of events (SOEs), alarms, and maintenance, is left in the relays (Intelligent Electronic Devices – IEDs).

The real-time information is brought into a utility’s control center through a variety of communications methods, including telephone, two-way radio, microwave, and fiber.

At the substation end of the communications connection is an RTU (Remote Terminal Unit), which may be the data concentrator or may have an external concentrator. It is connected to the utility relays that control substation equipment such as breakers; the connections within the substation are generally done with a local area network (a fiber ring or copper cables).

Benefits of Local HMI

  • Store history of all alarms and Sequence of Events at the substation in one local historian database
  • Enable engineers/technicians to retrieve this information locally as well as remotely from their desks
  • Leverage HMI to allow operation of the breakers or other equipment based on their security requirements
  • Allow Comtrade files from the relays to be moved from IED relays to the engineer’s desk through this system
  • Minimise communications traffic over master SCADA communications
  • Limit access to master SCADA

Benefits of the Distributed Architecture

The use of local HMI enables a distributed architecture SCADA system, which presents an entirely new way to configure the utility substation with less complexity and more accessibility for engineers and technicians.

It consists of local HMIs with full SCADA control and a central control room that provides visibility, command and control, and data retrieval by utilising the HMIs—providing the infrastructure for a smarter grid that delivers improved operational and financial results.

Increased Flexibility and Lower Costs

The new architecture allows utilities to expand functional operations by preparing for smart grid functionalities without major reprogramming of a large SCADA system. From a physical layout perspective, this architecture allows for greater physical flexibility in substation expansions and eliminates the need for the RTU/data concentrator.

At new substations, control houses are often built to house the relays that control the breakers, allowing technicians to work on the relays in all types of weather—an expense that has become accepted but should now be questioned. Using a distributed architecture, a control building is no longer necessary because the local SCADA acts as a gateway, allowing for reprograming of all points accessible to the local SCADA.

Therefore, the relays can go back into the breaker cabinets and be interrogated and programmed from the engineer’s desk—thus eliminating travel time to the substation. Without the need for the house, the panels and racks in the house can be eliminated, as well as the time and costs associated with pulling and landing multiple sets of copper relay cables.

And finally, standardisation plays a key role. The expensive custom SCADA systems with their high annual maintenance fees can be eliminated as a version of the SCADA software is installed on standard Windows® servers in the control room. This version of the software views the thick clients in the substation through traditional communications channels or newer ones as the utility creates them.

Improved Insight and Reliability

The use of the local SCADA as a thick client allows for simpler creation of the screens and point connections using the IEC61850 communications protocol, which helps decrease install time (think plug & play), and the screens can be easily replicated in the control room. The local SCADA will have high-speed storage of all events available to the relays, supported by an appropriate database type.

The high-speed data historian can capture all the points and replicate the data into the control room at any time for analysis, or the analysis can be done via the web on the thick client at the substation from an engineer’s desk.

The local SCADA can also be used to review the data from PMUs (Phaser Monitoring Units) to detect anomalies on the transmission grid and transmit the data to PDCs (Phaser Data Concentrators). It can utilise a common clock for all relay operations, thus properly ordering the SOEs of breakers without trying to account for time stamp errors.

Furthermore, the local SCADA puts computing power out into the field where the next two areas of evolution to the grid will occur: distributed generation and microgrids. With the computing power put in closer to the distribution assets, the system can utilise meter data without extensive backhaul and processing delays.

It can automatically balance the substation’s loads and resources, and island the substation or sections of the distribution system automatically for continuous operations. For operations involving multiple substations, the control room SCADA system will oversee the coordination of activities.

Impacts on Substation Design and Construction

The changes espoused here have a profound impact on the physical layout of the substation.

Traditional substation layouts include a building to house the battery bank, IED relays, low voltage breakers, RTU and communications equipment. These block buildings needed to be centrally located within the substation due to signal attenuation and voltage drops; the extensive cabling required for bringing each point from the breaker to the relays, the low voltage AC power, and DC power can now be reduced to the LAN cables and the AC & DC power.

Reduced cabling eliminates the need for the cable trench system that occupies large areas and limits material locations, truck accessibility, and expansion of the substation. Without the building and trench system, the substation also becomes less costly to construct and easier to modify for expansions and new equipment installations.

The few remaining items from the house such as batteries installed in large cabinets with local air conditioning (if required) can be relocated should a substation redesign be initiated. The HMI and other communications equipment can also be located in free-standing cabinets, enabling a much smaller footprint.

Migration Strategy

For utilities with an existing large, centrally controlled SCADA system, a planned migration strategy is required to evolve toward a distributed architecture system.

The first phase will be to install the local HMI on single board computers with flash memory in each substation.

The system can be completely configured but used only as the local HMI until these single board computers are installed in every substation; these can be accessed via existing large-scale EMS systems.

The second phase will be to install redundant (or quad) servers in the control room operating in parallel with the existing central SCADA system.

The third phase will be to complete the communications links to the HMIs. These can be done through any of the various secure communications methods currently available such as fiber, radio, microwave or even internet, but larger bandwidth systems are preferred.

Finally, the HMIs will be converted to local SCADA with the functionality tested before going live. The old systems can then be used as backup or removed to eliminate any unauthorised access into the substations.

Servers in the control center should be isolated from the enterprise data systems by uni-directional firewalls that allow data out of the control center into enterprise systems but not data from the enterprise system into the control center, as this will protect against hacking and unauthorised use.

Conclusion

While substation SCADA architecture has not changed much since utilities first employed SCADA in the 1980s, computing technologies and architectures have evolved, making it possible for utilities to rethink how they design their substations and operate their electric transmission and distribution systems.

By embracing a new distributed architecture with local HMI, utilities can take a significant leap forward toward a smarter grid.

The advantages of leveraging a distributed architecture are twofold: It increases the functionality of the SCADA system to allow for comprehensive data access by engineers, and it allows for a much simpler and more flexible substation layout.

Adding to the ease for migration, the replacement of legacy "main frame" SCADA systems no longer requires extensive consulting assignments and customised programing, and standardisation based on IEC61850 makes SCADA system configuration faster and more robust.

The changes may seem radical but utilities that can leverage the technologies available today can reap ongoing benefits, including reduced costs, greater flexibility, and ease of use.

The business case to drive this new distributed architecture off the drawing board and onto the grid is more compelling now than ever as utilities focus on improved operational performance and
financial sustainability.