Home Trusted by 600,000+ buyers

Meatworkers prone to violence, expert says

31 January, 2013

Meatworkers are more inclined to commit acts of violence, new research by Flinders University animal studies expert Dr Nik Taylor has found.

The study, involving researchers from Central Queensland University, examined the link between attitudes towards animals and propensity for human-directed aggression among two primary industry cohorts, farmers and meatworkers.

Of the 67 participants surveyed, meatworkers had a significantly higher propensity for physical aggression, anger and hostility than farmers, with those from the meat processing cohort tending to display more negative attitudes to animals.

Interestingly, farmers were found to have significantly lower levels of propensity for aggression than the general community while slaughterhouse workers scored higher than the community benchmark.

Attitudes to animal welfare among the meatworker group largely depended on the type of work participants were engaged in, with those working in the boning room having lower average scores than those working on the kill floor.

Other variables including income, education and pet ownership had no significant effect on the two groups’ propensity for violence or attitudes towards animals, however 76 per cent of farmers reported having a pet compared with only 54 per cent of meatworkers.

Dr Taylor said another noteworthy finding was that women, regardless of employment as farmers or meatworkers, scored six per cent lower than men in their attitudes towards animal welfare.

"It was assumed women would be more pro-animal but this wasn’t the case," Dr Taylor said.

"Equally unexpected, female meatworkers were found to have higher propensities for aggression, particularly verbal and physical aggression, than male meatworkers and all the farmers," she said.

"Most of the current literature on the impact of meatwork employment focuses solely on the male experience but our findings show women are just as vulnerable to the physical and emotional effects of the job so this is an area in desperate need of further investigation."

Dr Taylor said the meatworker group also displayed more "utilitarian attitudes" towards animal welfare, and due to their occupations, viewed animals as commodities.

"One respondent said they agreed with the statement that breeding animals for their skins was a legitimate use of the animal ‘provided there was no waste of the rest of the animal’, which is a clear indication of this utilitarian view," she said.

In addition, Dr Taylor said propensity for aggression scores among meatworkers were similar to some reported by incarcerated populations, suggesting the constant exposure to violence within meat processing plants could cause psychological damage and lead to higher propensities for aggression.

"Further research with this population is urgently needed to ascertain the potential damaging psychological effects of being employed in the industry, not only for the individual and the community they live in but for the animals they come into contact with," she said.

"As this is an area of interest to both policymakers and the public, more research is needed to unmask the multiple issues associated with animal processing."

The study has just been published in the leading international journal Society and Animals.

Have your say...

We welcome thoughtful comments from readers
Reload characters
Type the characters you see in this box. This helps us prevent automated programs from sending spam.
John Kizon | Sunday, February 10, 2013, 8:32 AM
This is hardly new. Just have a look at the occupations of convicted murderers(non family victims)and see the huge number of meat workers.Coroners courts have been providing this info for years.
dave d | Monday, February 11, 2013, 10:41 AM
Looks like it is "hold your hand out" time for further research funds. Tell me what this diatribe contributes to society ? That slaughter house workers don't faint at the sight of blood? That people who work around killing and butchering all day become Blasé’about a persons/animals life ? What is the point except another "Dr" holding their hand out for Taxpayers hard earned money
Robin Mark | Friday, February 15, 2013, 1:25 PM
Agree with you dave d. What a stupid survery. 67 participants, well, that certainly allows for great data. And by the way, farmers use dogs in their work so I would imagine they would have a higher percentage of 'pets'. Mind you, never forget that most serial killers have a florist background. Just another stupid stat. If you are really interested I can prove to you that carrots cause more cases of lung cancer than smoking. Absolutely. Just numbers, they mean nothing in isolation or with sucha small survey group. But a great way for a Doctor to get a handout. How about studying something useful that will benefit society. I mean, after reading this am I meant to ask the bloke next to me at the bar if he is a meatworker? And if so should I slink away? Silly.
dave d | Thursday, April 11, 2013, 4:48 PM
Not slink - Run Robin Run !!! :-)